Wednesday 29 March 2017

Spurious human rights

Way back in 2001 I was called by LBC and asked to talk live on the radio to a London audience on a Fife council decision to invoke European Human Rights legislation to refuse planning permission to the owners of the Cambo Arms Hotel, Kingsbarns' last pub, to close it and develop the site as housing.
Now, I have serious doubts where this rather spurious involvement of human rights played much part in the final planning decision. It had more to do with a very well run campaign by regulars in the pub (he says immodestly) and the decision of the council to count each signature on a petition as a separate objection.
In short, human rights was used as the excuse to do the right thing. The pub is still there and doing rather better than OK.
My taste of media stardom came to nothing. After hanging on for half an hour my interview was dropped in favour of an item on irritable bowel syndrome.

For 16 years I have had to bear the cross of being found less interesting than irritable bowel syndrome.

But now I feel the need to invoke a spurious human right of my own.

Regular readers will know that I bear the dodgiest of diagnoses. One that will, in the absence of miracles, severely limit my lifespan. And the human right I want to suggest is that this should be the worst thing in my life right now.

And it simply isn't.

The thing any dying parent wants to know is that their family will be OK when they are gone.
If I go I will leave a wonderful, strong and clever wife and children as well qualified and talented as I could ever have hoped for. If any are equipped to succeed in the 21st century it is them.

And yet this morning a prime minister nobody elected and who campaigned for us to remain in Europe has decided that her party unity needs us to look for a future outside the EU, worse she has decided that any who oppose this are traitors. And both the conservative party and the supine, leaderless labour party are allowing their policy on Europe to be guided by the disintegrating UKIP. A party who have never had an MP elected to our parliament.

Last June we had an advisory referendum, which was won by a campaign characterised by outright lies from the Leave campaign. Not least of these lies was the attempt to smear the remain campaign as being as dishonest as the leavers.
The greatest of these lies, of course was the promise to give £350m per week to our NHS. This was never any more than an outright lie and even the Leave campaign admit that they would have lost without it.

For nearly 60 years I have been proud to be British but the institutions I have loved and honoured are disintegrating.

The BBC, through the 20th century a beacon of truth, has become enmired in the desperate attempt to maintain a decent level of license fee. As part of this they have adopted a policy of extreme balance.
If climate change is agreed by 99% of scientists this erzatz balance ensures that one scientist has to debate one denier,  probably not a scientist as denying scientists are thin on the ground. The verdict is reached, not on evidence, but on the debating ability of these 2 people.  And as often as not another nail is knocked into mankinds future as people are allowed to believe there is a debate on anthropogenic climate change where there is none. It is happening and if unchecked may destroy us (well you really)
The BBC insistence on 'balance' bears a high proportion of the blame for the Brexit farce.
Their insistence on giving equal weight to UKIP and Farage during debates,  including BBCQT, gave a completely false sense of where the debate was going.

What of the NHS.
I take this rather personally at the moment and my pride in what my fellow citizens who work there are achieving is equalled only at my anger at the London government who are stripping funding from our health service.
Funding for social care has been hammered, certainly in England, perhaps less so north of the border. This means that the NHS also has to fund those patients who could be moved to outside care but who still need beds but whose presence means that critically sick people may spend many hours on trolleys or in corridors waiting for the elusive bed.
Jeremy Cunt, of course, regularly promises new money. Sadly he promises the same new money many times so it is hard to be sure how little of it the NHS will ever see.
Probably not a lot, especially as the last £2 billion promised is to be divided between our NHS and private companies supplying specialist services.
I have had some experience of these external contractors,  several of my recent CT scans were privately done. Unlike NHS services they are able to charge cost plus profit. So at best 20% of our taxes go right into private hands (some may come back in tax, but probably not a lot). And even if the guys working the machinery (my experience is limited but all those operating the equipment have been men, maybe equality has to take a back seat in the brave new world of the private NHS) are not paid much more than NHS staff, they have to be paid to drive up from the south, and put up in decent hotels.

And above all this are 2 fictions.

Austerity is the excuse the government uses to take money from the poor and disabled (I, Daniel Blake is not an exaggerated fiction as many of our ruling cabal would like to portray it, but a hideous depiction of what greed and austerity is doing to the weakest in our society).
The second fiction, much voiced by the incoming tory government, is WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER.

Bollocks.

As Daniel Blake is dehumanised the wealthiest in Britain are steadily getting richer. Austerity doesn't mean that our tax system is fair.
Billions in taxes are avoided, perhaps even evaded, and the money the government spends trying to get back these missing taxes is dwarfed by that spent on reclaiming overpaid benefits, where the government is happy to make a loss on occasion just as long as no scrounger makes a couple of hundred pounds more than the meanest calculation.  God forbid any child should have a new pair of shoes they don't deserve.

I am running out of space and time. I don't have time to explain my shame and humiliation as the tory government use European expats living in this country, paying tax, raising children and enriching our society, as bargaining chips in their brexit suicide pact.
Those married to British spouses for 30 years, with British children, being told to prepare for expulsion!

As Scots we have a choice.

I don't know what the outcome of the referendum will be. I am not even absolutely certain how (in the unlikely event I am still here) I would vote.
I do know that I see more of the British values I cherish in the Scottish parliament than I have seen in Westminster these many years. There is still a hope for fairness and honesty so long missing in London.
Independence would be bloody hard work, and we might not be as well off as some of us have been. But perhaps our tolerance of difference, our value for education and the value we could put on public service might allow Scotland to become a nation we can be proud of.

Monday 13 March 2017

Ex limbo

Not, you will be glad to hear an end to my inglorious career in dancing under low bars. Not that I am unfamiliar to low bars, but generally they offer a little more support than the dancing sort.
Nor yet the religious limbo, which I confess I don't understand at all, but strongly suspect that after a lifetime of atheism I am ineligbible.
I guess that means that my limbo is more slangy than either of these and means only a state of uncertainty which could go either of two ways.

My particular limbo has followed the end of the effectiveness of my wonderdrug Afatinib.
There is another drug, known to its admirers as Osmertinib. To be prescribed this my tumour had to be biopsied and there was (perhaps still is) a little more than a 50% chance that Osmertinib would be active against the mutated cells currently frolicking unfettered in my lungs and elsewhere.

Well the biopsy has failed to produce any cancerous cells. I don't want to go in to this in any more detail; any comments would certainly be libellous,  would probably be inaccurate, and in any case unhelpful.  We are where we are. Anyway I don't want to dent my adoration of our NHS

We now await a meeting with Dr Adamson, oncologist of note

There is still a chance that we can ask for a second biopsy and perhaps still gain access to WD2. 
There is a secondary treatment, a mixed chemotherapy, which I have done too little to learn about.  It seems to have more side effects and less chance of positive result. Thinking about it will make me think seriously about quality and quantity of life. I am happy to crawl through barbed wire to spend a year or three in the health I have enjoyed since my first diagnosis, but I am much less keen to accept a few more months as an invalid. (Although I have to say that I have no knowledge of the clinical value of crawling through barbed wire as a treatment. Metaphor alert again)

So here we are, not really out of limbo and for a few hours at least less positive, less humerous than usual.
Love you all.